VONBRIGÐI !!!!!

Ég var að fá póst frá Pat þar sem hann er ekki ánægður með lokakaflana í ritgerðinni minni. Ég er á algjörum bömmer eftir þessar fréttir. En pósturinn útskýrir sig sjálfur.

1. avoid using brief and short in the 4.1 introduction, "platform for discussion" I dont think is the best way to present ...
2. Then from 128 to 154 is very good!! On page 154 I would highligt Self Development, Learning Climate... etc. etc.. better
3. On page 160+ you use the words correct and incorrect.. We talked about this before. use accept and rejected only.
4. THE BIG THING MISSING IN CHAPTER 4 IS A DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS WITH RESPECT TO THE THEORY AND YOUR VIEWS... THIS IS A KEY ELEMENT IN THIS CHAPTER!!!!!!!!!!! YOU NEED TO SHOW THE READER THAT YOU CAN INTEGRATE YOUR RESULTS WITH OTHER WORK IN THE AREA!
5. Chapter 5 needs a rework now. 5.1 is not a good introduction to this key chapter. Why review the earlier chapters?? 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 seem out of place or not needed at all.
6. Contributions of the research is the key section in this chapter. I would try to concentrate on your 3 to 5 major contributions and then add some minor contributions. This has to be a section of about 5 pages and it is a key element in the final evalutation of your work ... also you skip from 5.4 to 5.8 and then another 5.8
7. Follow contributions with Limitations and Strengths... needs to be longer and better.
In conclusion you have a nice writing style, but fall short in what you should do for the last part of chapt 4 and most of chapt 5.

Svo er byrjað að rigna úti. Táknrænt ekki satt ???